Judge Herbert Stettin has filed false sworn financial and gift disclosures with the State of Florida since 1999 that failed to properly disclose the sources of millions of dollars in payments and the activity of his sole proprietorship law firm, Hebert Stettin P.A.
FL Ethics Opinion 73-27
ETHICS, OPINION 73-27
2/11/10 11:58 AM
OPINION 73-27 November 14, 1973 A former municipal judge may not permit his telephone answering service to answer his phone "Judge X's office." Note: Judicial conduct is governed by the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Judicial Ethics Committee issues opinions interpreting this Code. Opinion: 70-63 Vice Chairman Daniels stated the opinion of the committee: From 1957 through 1965, the inquiring lawyer was a municipal judge and has become widely known as Judge X in the community where he now practices. His telephone answering service answers his phone, "Judge X's office." Inquiry is made as to whether such answering service practice is proper. The question must be answered in the negative. Former Opinion 7063 [since withdrawn] is squarely in point, where we there said: A former judicial officer should never personally use the courtesy title "judge" in his law practice. He should instruct his office staff, partners and associates to refrain from affirmatively placing third persons, lawyers or otherwise, in an embarrassing posture of dealing with "Judge ..........
[Revised: 06-23-2009 ]
© 2005 The Florida Bar
Page 1 of 1
Published under a Creative Commons License By attribution, non-commercial
|Item 15 FL Ethics Opinion 73-27.pdf||47.66 KB|